Meaning and Measure Misty Weaver: Content Strategy for meaningful experiences with measurable results

April 12, 2021

Standstill Agreement Upsc

Filed under: Uncategorized — admin @ 11:42 am

A status quo agreement is a contract that contains provisions governing how a bidder in a company can buy, sell or vote shares of the target company. A status quo agreement can effectively paralyze or stop the hostile takeover process if the parties are unable to negotiate a friendly agreement. In banking, a status quo agreement between a lender and a borrower terminates the contractual repayment plan of a struggling borrower and imposes certain steps that the borrower must take. Meanwhile, several attempts have been made to reach an agreement between Sheikh Abdullah and the Indian government. The Nizam of Hyderabad, which had previously obtained a three-month extension to agree on new agreements with the Dominion of India, wrote to the Indian government on 18 September that it was ready to enter into an association agreement with India. But he said membership would cause unrest and bloodshed in the state. [7] On 11 October, Hyderabad sent a delegation to Delhi with a draft status quo agreement, described as “complex” by V. P. Menon, Secretary of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Minister of State Vallabhbhai Patel rejected any agreement that would not fully cede defence and foreign affairs matters to the Indian government.

On the advice of Governor General Louis Mountbatten, Menon prepared a new draft treaty that was referred with the Hyderabad delegation. The Nizam Executive Council reviewed the agreement and approved it by six votes to three. Nizam agreed, but delayed the signing of the agreement. [8] The accession instrument signed by the Maharaja, with its own unique clauses, was considered a quasi-temporary agreement between J-K and India, but just like other princely states, namely Hyderabad and Travancore, they had their own clauses, which were inserted into their accession instruments, which were watered down in due course and that these princely states fully complied with the Indian Constitution. , as well as the J-K membership clauses. In this sense, the current revocation of Article 370 is exactly under the constitution of India and it is high time that Kashmiris accepted that they are legitimate citizens of India and that they deny the external influences that indoctrinate them and strive to lead peaceful and prosperous lives.

No Comments

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.

Powered by WordPress